Nepal has a population of 29.9M, compared to Sweden's 10.6M. Nepal is 2.8 times more populous than Sweden. Economically, Sweden ($603.7B) has a GDP 14.1 times larger than Nepal's ($42.9B). Sweden covers 450,295 km², 3.1 times larger than Nepal's 147,181 km². Life expectancy in Sweden stands at 83.3 years, 13.0 years higher than Nepal's 70.4 years.
| Population | 29.9M | 10.6M |
| Area | 147,181 km² | 450,295 km² |
| GDP | $42.9B | $603.7B |
| GDP Per Capita | $1,447.31 | $57,117.488 |
| Life Expectancy | 70.4 yrs | 83.3 yrs |
| Infant Mortality | 23.3 | 2.0 |
| Literacy Rate | — | — |
| Unemployment | 10.5% | 8.7% |
| Capital | Kathmandu | Stockholm |
| Region | Asia | Europe |
| Languages | Nepali | Swedish |
| Currencies | NPR (₨) | SEK (kr) |
Last updated: April 2026
All data sourced from World Bank Open Data (2025) and REST Countries API. Economic data may reflect most recent available year.
Nepal is 2.8 times more populous than Sweden, with 29.9M residents compared to 10.6M. Nepal is a nation of 29.9M people, while Sweden is a nation of 10.6M people. In terms of population density, Nepal averages 203 people per km² (dense), while Sweden averages 24 people per km² (sparse). Population growth rate data is not available for either country over the past decade.
Nepal is classified as a lower-middle-income economy, while Sweden is classified as a high-income economy. The Sweden economy ($603.7B) is 14.1 times larger than Nepal's ($42.9B). Nepal's GDP per capita of $1,447.31 is 87% below the regional average of 11,200 for Asia. Sweden's GDP per capita of $57,117.488 is 104% above the regional average of 28,000 for Europe. On a per-capita basis, residents of Sweden are on average 39.5 times wealthier than those in Nepal.
Life expectancy in Nepal is 70.4 years, compared to 83.3 years in Sweden, a gap of 13.0 years. Sweden (83.3 years) is 11.3 years above the global average of 72 years, while Nepal (70.4 years) is 1.6 years below the global average of 72 years. At 23.3 deaths per 1,000 live births, Nepal's infant mortality is 1065% higher than Sweden's 2.0.
Sweden (450,295 km²) is 3.1 times larger by land area than Nepal (147,181 km²). Nepal shares borders with 2 countries, while Sweden borders 2 countries. Nepal spans 1 timezone, compared to Sweden's 1 timezone. Nepal lies in Asia, while Sweden is located in Europe. Nepal is categorized within the Asia region (Southern Asia), whereas Sweden belongs to Europe (Northern Europe).
The most significant difference between Nepal and Sweden is in GDP per capita: Nepal's $1,447.31 compared to Sweden's $57,117.488 represents a 97% gap. The most significant difference between Nepal and Sweden is in GDP: Nepal's $42.9B compared to Sweden's $603.7B represents a 93% gap. The most significant difference between Nepal and Sweden is in infant mortality: Nepal's 23.3 per 1,000 compared to Sweden's 2.0 per 1,000 represents a 91% gap. These disparities reflect the broader structural differences between Nepal's lower-middle-income economy and Sweden's high-income economy.
Sweden has a GDP per capita of $57,117.488, which is 39.5x that of Nepal ($1,447.31). This gap reflects differences in economic development, industrial structure, and workforce productivity. In practical terms, average purchasing power in Sweden is significantly higher, though cost of living differences partially offset the raw income gap.
Nepal is 8.6x more densely populated than Sweden (203 vs 24 people per km²). Higher density typically correlates with more urbanization, greater demand for public transit, and higher housing costs. Sweden's lower density suggests more rural land use and potentially lower urban congestion.
Citizens of Sweden live an average of 13.0 years longer than those of Nepal (83.3 vs 70.4 years). This gap reflects differences in healthcare access, nutrition, public health infrastructure, and environmental factors. This is a substantial gap that suggests significant differences in healthcare systems and overall living conditions.
Nepal's economy grew at 3.7% compared to Sweden's 0.8%. Both countries show healthy growth, though Nepal has a modest edge in economic dynamism.
For family travel, Sweden generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (2.0 vs 23.3 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Nepal offers its own advantages, including a more compact geography that is easier to navigate with children. Both countries have family-friendly attractions, though Sweden's higher GDP per capita typically correlates with better tourist infrastructure, public transport, and English-language availability.
Nepal is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $1,447.31 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Nepal can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Sweden. However, Sweden may offer better value in specific categories such as intercity transport or package deals. Shoulder season travel in either country helps reduce costs further.
Sweden's life expectancy of 83.3 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Nepal may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, climate preferences, and proximity to international airports. Both countries have established expat communities, though the specific visa options and healthcare quality vary by region within each country.
Sweden's GDP per capita is 39.5x that of Nepal, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Sweden, while Nepal offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significantly by city within each country. Major urban centers in Nepal can approach or exceed average costs in Sweden's smaller cities.
For digital nomads choosing between Nepal and Sweden, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Nepal spans 1 timezone while Sweden covers 1. Nepal's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote income. Both countries have growing digital nomad communities, though specific visa requirements for remote workers differ and should be verified before committing to a longer stay.
Nepal is larger by population, with 29.9M residents compared to Sweden's 10.6M. Nepal is 2.8 times more populous than Sweden.
Sweden has the higher GDP at $603.7B, compared to Nepal's $42.9B. Sweden's economy is 14.1 times larger.
Sweden has a higher life expectancy at 83.3 years, compared to Nepal's 70.4 years. The gap between the two countries is 13.0 years. Nepal's life expectancy is 1.6 years below the global average of 72 years, while Sweden's is 11.3 years above the global average of 72 years.
Sweden is larger by land area, covering 450,295 km² compared to Nepal's 147,181 km². Sweden is 3.1 times larger than Nepal.
Nepal recognizes the following official language: Nepali. Sweden recognizes: Swedish. The two countries do not share an official language.
Sweden has lower inflation at 2.8%, compared to Nepal's 4.7%. Sweden's inflation is within the 2-3% range considered stable by most central banks, while Nepal's rate is moderately elevated above the global median of 3.5%.
For family travel, Sweden generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (2.0 vs 23.3 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Nepal offers its own advantages, including a more compact geography that is easier to navigate with children. Both countries ...
Nepal is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $1,447.31 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Nepal can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Sweden. However, Sweden may offer better value in spe...
Sweden's life expectancy of 83.3 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Nepal may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, climate ...
Sweden's GDP per capita is 39.5x that of Nepal, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Sweden, while Nepal offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significantly by c...
For digital nomads choosing between Nepal and Sweden, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Nepal spans 1 timezone while Sweden covers 1. Nepal's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote income. Both...