Sudan has a population of 51.7M, compared to Cambodia's 17.6M. Sudan is 2.9 times more populous than Cambodia. Economically, Sudan ($49.7B) has a GDP 1.1 times larger than Cambodia's ($46.4B). Sudan covers 1,886,068 km², 10.4 times larger than Cambodia's 181,035 km². Life expectancy in Cambodia stands at 70.7 years, 4.3 years higher than Sudan's 66.3 years.
| Population | 51.7M | 17.6M |
| Area | 1,886,068 km² | 181,035 km² |
| GDP | $49.7B | $46.4B |
| GDP Per Capita | $984.608 | $2,627.88 |
| Life Expectancy | 66.3 yrs | 70.7 yrs |
| Infant Mortality | 39.2 | 20.3 |
| Literacy Rate | — | — |
| Unemployment | — | 0.3% |
| Capital | Khartoum | Phnom Penh |
| Region | Africa | Asia |
| Languages | Arabic, English | Khmer |
| Currencies | SDG (ج.س) | KHR (៛), USD ($) |
Last updated: April 2026
All data sourced from World Bank Open Data (2025) and REST Countries API. Economic data may reflect most recent available year.
Sudan is 2.9 times more populous than Cambodia, with 51.7M residents compared to 17.6M. Sudan is among the world's 30 most populous countries, while Cambodia is a nation of 17.6M people. In terms of population density, Sudan averages 27 people per km² (sparse), while Cambodia averages 97 people per km² (moderate). Cambodia has grown at 1.39% annually over the past decade. Population growth data is not available for Sudan.
Sudan is classified as a low-income economy, while Cambodia is classified as a lower-middle-income economy. The Sudan economy ($49.7B) is 1.1 times larger than Cambodia's ($46.4B). Sudan's GDP per capita of $984.608 is 55% below the regional average of 2,200 for Africa. Cambodia's GDP per capita of $2,627.88 is 77% below the regional average of 11,200 for Asia. On a per-capita basis, residents of Cambodia are on average 2.7 times wealthier than those in Sudan.
Life expectancy in Sudan is 66.3 years, compared to 70.7 years in Cambodia, a gap of 4.3 years. Cambodia (70.7 years) is 1.3 years below the global average of 72 years, while Sudan (66.3 years) is 5.7 years below the global average of 72 years. At 39.2 deaths per 1,000 live births, Sudan's infant mortality is 93% higher than Cambodia's 20.3.
Sudan (1,886,068 km²) is 10.4 times larger by land area than Cambodia (181,035 km²). Sudan shares borders with 7 countries, while Cambodia borders 3 countries. Sudan spans 1 timezone, compared to Cambodia's 1 timezone. Sudan lies in Africa, while Cambodia is located in Asia. Sudan is categorized within the Africa region (Northern Africa), whereas Cambodia belongs to Asia (South-Eastern Asia).
The most significant difference between Sudan and Cambodia is in land area: Sudan's 1,886,068 km² compared to Cambodia's 181,035 km² represents a 90% gap. The most significant difference between Sudan and Cambodia is in population: Sudan's 51.7M compared to Cambodia's 17.6M represents a 66% gap. The most significant difference between Sudan and Cambodia is in GDP per capita: Sudan's $984.608 compared to Cambodia's $2,627.88 represents a 63% gap. These disparities reflect the broader structural differences between Sudan's low-income economy and Cambodia's lower-middle-income economy.
Cambodia has a GDP per capita of $2,627.88, which is 2.7x that of Sudan ($984.608). This gap reflects differences in economic development, industrial structure, and workforce productivity. In practical terms, average purchasing power in Cambodia is significantly higher, though cost of living differences partially offset the raw income gap.
Cambodia is 3.5x more densely populated than Sudan (97 vs 27 people per km²). Higher density typically correlates with more urbanization, greater demand for public transit, and higher housing costs. Sudan's lower density suggests more rural land use and potentially lower urban congestion.
Citizens of Cambodia live an average of 4.3 years longer than those of Sudan (70.7 vs 66.3 years). This gap reflects differences in healthcare access, nutrition, public health infrastructure, and environmental factors. This is a moderate difference that could narrow with continued development.
Cambodia's economy grew at 6.0% compared to Sudan's -14.0%. Cambodia's high growth rate suggests a rapidly developing economy with expanding opportunities. Sudan's negative growth indicates economic contraction.
For family travel, Cambodia generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (20.3 vs 39.2 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Sudan offers its own advantages, including more geographic diversity for road trips. Both countries have family-friendly attractions, though Cambodia's higher GDP per capita typically correlates with better tourist infrastructure, public transport, and English-language availability.
Sudan is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $984.608 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Sudan can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Cambodia. However, Cambodia may offer better value in specific categories such as intercity transport or package deals. Shoulder season travel in either country helps reduce costs further.
Cambodia's life expectancy of 70.7 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Sudan may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, climate preferences, and proximity to international airports. Both countries have established expat communities, though the specific visa options and healthcare quality vary by region within each country.
Cambodia's GDP per capita is 2.7x that of Sudan, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Cambodia, while Sudan offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significantly by city within each country. Major urban centers in Sudan can approach or exceed average costs in Cambodia's smaller cities.
For digital nomads choosing between Sudan and Cambodia, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Sudan spans 1 timezone while Cambodia covers 1. Sudan's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote income. Both countries have growing digital nomad communities, though specific visa requirements for remote workers differ and should be verified before committing to a longer stay.
Sudan is larger by population, with 51.7M residents compared to Cambodia's 17.6M. Sudan is 2.9 times more populous than Cambodia.
Sudan has the higher GDP at $49.7B, compared to Cambodia's $46.4B. Sudan's economy is 1.1 times larger.
Cambodia has a higher life expectancy at 70.7 years, compared to Sudan's 66.3 years. The gap between the two countries is 4.3 years. Sudan's life expectancy is 5.7 years below the global average of 72 years, while Cambodia's is 1.3 years below the global average of 72 years.
Sudan is larger by land area, covering 1,886,068 km² compared to Cambodia's 181,035 km². Sudan is 10.4 times larger than Cambodia.
Sudan recognizes the following languages: Arabic, English. Cambodia recognizes: Khmer. The two countries do not share an official language.
Inflation data is not available for Sudan. Cambodia's inflation rate is 0.8%.
For family travel, Cambodia generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (20.3 vs 39.2 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Sudan offers its own advantages, including more geographic diversity for road trips. Both countries have family-friendly a...
Sudan is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $984.608 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Sudan can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Cambodia. However, Cambodia may offer better value in ...
Cambodia's life expectancy of 70.7 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Sudan may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, climat...
Cambodia's GDP per capita is 2.7x that of Sudan, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Cambodia, while Sudan offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significantly b...
For digital nomads choosing between Sudan and Cambodia, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Sudan spans 1 timezone while Cambodia covers 1. Sudan's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote income. ...