Burkina Faso has a population of 24.1M, compared to Malawi's 20.7M. Burkina Faso is 1.2 times more populous than Malawi. Economically, Burkina Faso ($23.1B) has a GDP 2.0 times larger than Malawi's ($11.3B). Burkina Faso covers 272,967 km², 2.3 times larger than Malawi's 118,484 km². Life expectancy in Malawi stands at 67.4 years, 6.3 years higher than Burkina Faso's 61.1 years.
| Population | 24.1M | 20.7M |
| Area | 272,967 km² | 118,484 km² |
| GDP | $23.1B | $11.3B |
| GDP Per Capita | $981.993 | $522.57 |
| Life Expectancy | 61.1 yrs | 67.4 yrs |
| Infant Mortality | 44.8 | 29.4 |
| Literacy Rate | — | — |
| Unemployment | 3.5% | 5.1% |
| Capital | Ouagadougou | Lilongwe |
| Region | Africa | Africa |
| Languages | French | English, Chewa |
| Currencies | XOF (Fr) | MWK (MK) |
Last updated: April 2026
All data sourced from World Bank Open Data (2025) and REST Countries API. Economic data may reflect most recent available year.
Burkina Faso is 1.2 times more populous than Malawi, with 24.1M residents compared to 20.7M. Burkina Faso is a nation of 24.1M people, while Malawi is a nation of 20.7M people. In terms of population density, Burkina Faso averages 88 people per km² (moderate), while Malawi averages 175 people per km² (moderate). Burkina Faso has grown at 2.67% annually over the past decade. Population growth data is not available for Malawi.
Burkina Faso is classified as a low-income economy, while Malawi is classified as a low-income economy. The Burkina Faso economy ($23.1B) is 2.0 times larger than Malawi's ($11.3B). Burkina Faso's GDP per capita of $981.993 is 55% below the regional average of 2,200 for Africa. Malawi's GDP per capita of $522.57 is 76% below the regional average of 2,200 for Africa. On a per-capita basis, residents of Burkina Faso are on average 1.9 times wealthier than those in Malawi.
Life expectancy in Burkina Faso is 61.1 years, compared to 67.4 years in Malawi, a gap of 6.3 years. Malawi (67.4 years) is 4.6 years below the global average of 72 years, while Burkina Faso (61.1 years) is 10.9 years below the global average of 72 years. At 44.8 deaths per 1,000 live births, Burkina Faso's infant mortality is 52% higher than Malawi's 29.4.
Burkina Faso (272,967 km²) is 2.3 times larger by land area than Malawi (118,484 km²). Burkina Faso shares borders with 6 countries, while Malawi borders 3 countries. Burkina Faso spans 1 timezone, compared to Malawi's 1 timezone. Both Burkina Faso and Malawi are located in Africa. Both countries fall within the Africa region, though they occupy different subregions: Western Africa and Eastern Africa.
The most significant difference between Burkina Faso and Malawi is in land area: Burkina Faso's 272,967 km² compared to Malawi's 118,484 km² represents a 57% gap. The most significant difference between Burkina Faso and Malawi is in GDP: Burkina Faso's $23.1B compared to Malawi's $11.3B represents a 51% gap. The most significant difference between Burkina Faso and Malawi is in GDP per capita: Burkina Faso's $981.993 compared to Malawi's $522.57 represents a 47% gap. These disparities reflect the broader structural differences between Burkina Faso's low-income economy and Malawi's low-income economy.
Burkina Faso has a GDP per capita of $981.993, which is 1.9x that of Malawi ($522.57). This gap reflects differences in economic development, industrial structure, and workforce productivity. In practical terms, average purchasing power in Burkina Faso is significantly higher, though cost of living differences partially offset the raw income gap.
Malawi is 2.0x more densely populated than Burkina Faso (175 vs 88 people per km²). Higher density typically correlates with more urbanization, greater demand for public transit, and higher housing costs. Burkina Faso's lower density suggests more rural land use and potentially lower urban congestion.
Citizens of Malawi live an average of 6.3 years longer than those of Burkina Faso (67.4 vs 61.1 years). This gap reflects differences in healthcare access, nutrition, public health infrastructure, and environmental factors. This is a substantial gap that suggests significant differences in healthcare systems and overall living conditions.
Burkina Faso's economy grew at 4.8% compared to Malawi's 1.7%. Both countries show healthy growth, though Burkina Faso has a modest edge in economic dynamism.
For family travel, Malawi generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (29.4 vs 44.8 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Burkina Faso offers its own advantages, including more geographic diversity for road trips. Both countries have family-friendly attractions, though Malawi's higher GDP per capita typically correlates with better tourist infrastructure, public transport, and English-language availability.
Malawi is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $522.57 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Malawi can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Burkina Faso. However, Burkina Faso may offer better value in specific categories such as intercity transport or package deals. Shoulder season travel in either country helps reduce costs further.
Malawi's life expectancy of 67.4 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Burkina Faso may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, climate preferences, and proximity to international airports. Both countries have established expat communities, though the specific visa options and healthcare quality vary by region within each country.
Burkina Faso's GDP per capita is 1.9x that of Malawi, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Burkina Faso, while Malawi offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significantly by city within each country. Major urban centers in Malawi can approach or exceed average costs in Burkina Faso's smaller cities.
For digital nomads choosing between Burkina Faso and Malawi, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Burkina Faso spans 1 timezone while Malawi covers 1. Malawi's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote income. Both countries have growing digital nomad communities, though specific visa requirements for remote workers differ and should be verified before committing to a longer stay.
Burkina Faso is larger by population, with 24.1M residents compared to Malawi's 20.7M. Burkina Faso is 1.2 times more populous than Malawi.
Burkina Faso has the higher GDP at $23.1B, compared to Malawi's $11.3B. Burkina Faso's economy is 2.0 times larger.
Malawi has a higher life expectancy at 67.4 years, compared to Burkina Faso's 61.1 years. The gap between the two countries is 6.3 years. Burkina Faso's life expectancy is 10.9 years below the global average of 72 years, while Malawi's is 4.6 years below the global average of 72 years.
Burkina Faso is larger by land area, covering 272,967 km² compared to Malawi's 118,484 km². Burkina Faso is 2.3 times larger than Malawi.
Burkina Faso recognizes the following official language: French. Malawi recognizes: English, Chewa. The two countries do not share an official language.
Burkina Faso has lower inflation at 4.2%, compared to Malawi's 32.2%. Burkina Faso's inflation is moderately elevated above the global median of 3.5%, while Malawi's rate is severely elevated at 32.2%, a rate that erodes household purchasing power.
For family travel, Malawi generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (29.4 vs 44.8 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Burkina Faso offers its own advantages, including more geographic diversity for road trips. Both countries have family-frien...
Malawi is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $522.57 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Malawi can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Burkina Faso. However, Burkina Faso may offer better ...
Malawi's life expectancy of 67.4 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Burkina Faso may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, c...
Burkina Faso's GDP per capita is 1.9x that of Malawi, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Burkina Faso, while Malawi offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies signi...
For digital nomads choosing between Burkina Faso and Malawi, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Burkina Faso spans 1 timezone while Malawi covers 1. Malawi's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remo...