Niger has a population of 26.3M, compared to Sweden's 10.6M. Niger is 2.5 times more populous than Sweden. Economically, Sweden ($603.7B) has a GDP 30.4 times larger than Niger's ($19.9B). Niger covers 1,267,000 km², 2.8 times larger than Sweden's 450,295 km². Life expectancy in Sweden stands at 83.3 years, 22.1 years higher than Niger's 61.2 years.
| Population | 26.3M | 10.6M |
| Area | 1,267,000 km² | 450,295 km² |
| GDP | $19.9B | $603.7B |
| GDP Per Capita | $735.27 | $57,117.488 |
| Life Expectancy | 61.2 yrs | 83.3 yrs |
| Infant Mortality | 67.4 | 2.0 |
| Literacy Rate | — | — |
| Unemployment | 0.4% | 8.7% |
| Capital | Niamey | Stockholm |
| Region | Africa | Europe |
| Languages | French | Swedish |
| Currencies | XOF (Fr) | SEK (kr) |
Last updated: March 2026
All data sourced from World Bank Open Data (2025) and REST Countries API. Economic data may reflect most recent available year.
Niger is 2.5 times more populous than Sweden, with 26.3M residents compared to 10.6M. Niger is a nation of 26.3M people, while Sweden is a nation of 10.6M people. In terms of population density, Niger averages 21 people per km² (sparse), while Sweden averages 24 people per km² (sparse). Population growth rate data is not available for either country over the past decade.
Niger is classified as a low-income economy, while Sweden is classified as a high-income economy. The Sweden economy ($603.7B) is 30.4 times larger than Niger's ($19.9B). Niger's GDP per capita of $735.27 is 67% below the regional average of 2,200 for Africa. Sweden's GDP per capita of $57,117.488 is 104% above the regional average of 28,000 for Europe. On a per-capita basis, residents of Sweden are on average 77.7 times wealthier than those in Niger.
Life expectancy in Niger is 61.2 years, compared to 83.3 years in Sweden, a gap of 22.1 years. Sweden (83.3 years) is 11.3 years above the global average of 72 years, while Niger (61.2 years) is 10.8 years below the global average of 72 years. At 67.4 deaths per 1,000 live births, Niger's infant mortality is 3270% higher than Sweden's 2.0.
Niger (1,267,000 km²) is 2.8 times larger by land area than Sweden (450,295 km²). Niger shares borders with 7 countries, while Sweden borders 2 countries. Niger spans 1 timezone, compared to Sweden's 1 timezone. Niger lies in Africa, while Sweden is located in Europe. Niger is categorized within the Africa region (Western Africa), whereas Sweden belongs to Europe (Northern Europe).
The most significant difference between Niger and Sweden is in GDP per capita: Niger's $735.27 compared to Sweden's $57,117.488 represents a 99% gap. The most significant difference between Niger and Sweden is in infant mortality: Niger's 67.4 per 1,000 compared to Sweden's 2.0 per 1,000 represents a 97% gap. The most significant difference between Niger and Sweden is in GDP: Niger's $19.9B compared to Sweden's $603.7B represents a 97% gap. These disparities reflect the broader structural differences between Niger's low-income economy and Sweden's high-income economy.
Sweden has a GDP per capita of $57,117.488, which is 77.7x that of Niger ($735.27). This gap reflects differences in economic development, industrial structure, and workforce productivity. In practical terms, average purchasing power in Sweden is significantly higher, though cost of living differences partially offset the raw income gap.
Sweden is 1.1x more densely populated than Niger (24 vs 21 people per km²). Higher density typically correlates with more urbanization, greater demand for public transit, and higher housing costs. Niger's lower density suggests more rural land use and potentially lower urban congestion.
Citizens of Sweden live an average of 22.1 years longer than those of Niger (83.3 vs 61.2 years). This gap reflects differences in healthcare access, nutrition, public health infrastructure, and environmental factors. This is a substantial gap that suggests significant differences in healthcare systems and overall living conditions.
Niger's economy grew at 10.3% compared to Sweden's 0.8%. Niger's high growth rate suggests a rapidly developing economy with expanding opportunities.
For family travel, Sweden generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (2.0 vs 67.4 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Niger offers its own advantages, including more geographic diversity for road trips. Both countries have family-friendly attractions, though Sweden's higher GDP per capita typically correlates with better tourist infrastructure, public transport, and English-language availability.
Niger is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $735.27 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Niger can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Sweden. However, Sweden may offer better value in specific categories such as intercity transport or package deals. Shoulder season travel in either country helps reduce costs further.
Sweden's life expectancy of 83.3 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Niger may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, climate preferences, and proximity to international airports. Both countries have established expat communities, though the specific visa options and healthcare quality vary by region within each country.
Sweden's GDP per capita is 77.7x that of Niger, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Sweden, while Niger offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significantly by city within each country. Major urban centers in Niger can approach or exceed average costs in Sweden's smaller cities.
For digital nomads choosing between Niger and Sweden, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Niger spans 1 timezone while Sweden covers 1. Niger's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote income. Both countries have growing digital nomad communities, though specific visa requirements for remote workers differ and should be verified before committing to a longer stay.
Niger is larger by population, with 26.3M residents compared to Sweden's 10.6M. Niger is 2.5 times more populous than Sweden.
Sweden has the higher GDP at $603.7B, compared to Niger's $19.9B. Sweden's economy is 30.4 times larger.
Sweden has a higher life expectancy at 83.3 years, compared to Niger's 61.2 years. The gap between the two countries is 22.1 years. Niger's life expectancy is 10.8 years below the global average of 72 years, while Sweden's is 11.3 years above the global average of 72 years.
Niger is larger by land area, covering 1,267,000 km² compared to Sweden's 450,295 km². Niger is 2.8 times larger than Sweden.
Niger recognizes the following official language: French. Sweden recognizes: Swedish. The two countries do not share an official language.
Sweden has lower inflation at 2.8%, compared to Niger's 9.1%. Sweden's inflation is within the 2-3% range considered stable by most central banks, while Niger's rate is significantly above stable levels, at 2.6 times the global median.
For family travel, Sweden generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (2.0 vs 67.4 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Niger offers its own advantages, including more geographic diversity for road trips. Both countries have family-friendly attr...
Niger is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $735.27 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Niger can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Sweden. However, Sweden may offer better value in speci...
Sweden's life expectancy of 83.3 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Niger may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, climate ...
Sweden's GDP per capita is 77.7x that of Niger, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Sweden, while Niger offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significantly by c...
For digital nomads choosing between Niger and Sweden, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Niger spans 1 timezone while Sweden covers 1. Niger's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote income. Both...