Angola vs Sweden
Angola has a population of 36.2M, compared to Sweden's 10.6M. Angola is 3.4 times more populous than Sweden. Economically, Sweden ($603.7B) has a GDP 6.0 times larger than Angola's ($101.0B). Angola covers 1,246,700 km², 2.8 times larger than Sweden's 450,295 km². Life expectancy in Sweden stands at 83.3 years, 18.7 years higher than Angola's 64.6 years.
AngolaSweden| Population | +241.1%36.2M | -70.7%10.6M |
| Area | +176.9%1,246,700 km² | -63.9%450,295 km² |
| GDP | -83.3%$101.0B | +497.7%$603.7B |
| GDP Per Capita | -95.3%$2,665.874 | +2042.5%$57,117.488 |
| Life Expectancy | -22.4%64.6 yrs | +28.9%83.3 yrs |
| Infant Mortality | +1815.0%38.3 | -94.8%2.0 |
| Literacy Rate | — | — |
| Unemployment | +62.3%14.1% | -38.4%8.7% |
| Capital | Luanda | Stockholm |
| Region | Africa | Europe |
| Languages | Portuguese | Swedish |
| Currencies | AOA (Kz) | SEK (kr) |
Last updated: March 2026
All data sourced from World Bank Open Data (2025) and REST Countries API. Economic data may reflect most recent available year.
Population Comparison
Angola is 3.4 times more populous than Sweden, with 36.2M residents compared to 10.6M. Angola is a nation of 36.2M people, while Sweden is a nation of 10.6M people. In terms of population density, Angola averages 29 people per km² (sparse), while Sweden averages 24 people per km² (sparse). Population growth rate data is not available for either country over the past decade.
Economy Comparison
Angola is classified as a lower-middle-income economy, while Sweden is classified as a high-income economy. The Sweden economy ($603.7B) is 6.0 times larger than Angola's ($101.0B). Angola's GDP per capita of $2,665.874 is 21% above the regional average of 2,200 for Africa. Sweden's GDP per capita of $57,117.488 is 104% above the regional average of 28,000 for Europe. On a per-capita basis, residents of Sweden are on average 21.4 times wealthier than those in Angola.
Health & Quality of Life
Life expectancy in Angola is 64.6 years, compared to 83.3 years in Sweden, a gap of 18.7 years. Sweden (83.3 years) is 11.3 years above the global average of 72 years, while Angola (64.6 years) is 7.4 years below the global average of 72 years. At 38.3 deaths per 1,000 live births, Angola's infant mortality is 1815% higher than Sweden's 2.0.
Geographic Comparison
Angola (1,246,700 km²) is 2.8 times larger by land area than Sweden (450,295 km²). Angola shares borders with 4 countries, while Sweden borders 2 countries. Angola spans 1 timezone, compared to Sweden's 1 timezone. Angola lies in Africa, while Sweden is located in Europe. Angola is categorized within the Africa region (Middle Africa), whereas Sweden belongs to Europe (Northern Europe).
Key Differences
The most significant difference between Angola and Sweden is in GDP per capita: Angola's $2,665.874 compared to Sweden's $57,117.488 represents a 95% gap. The most significant difference between Angola and Sweden is in infant mortality: Angola's 38.3 per 1,000 compared to Sweden's 2.0 per 1,000 represents a 95% gap. The most significant difference between Angola and Sweden is in GDP: Angola's $101.0B compared to Sweden's $603.7B represents a 83% gap. These disparities reflect the broader structural differences between Angola's lower-middle-income economy and Sweden's high-income economy.
At a Glance: What the Numbers Mean
Living Standards
Sweden has a GDP per capita of $57,117.488, which is 21.4x that of Angola ($2,665.874). This gap reflects differences in economic development, industrial structure, and workforce productivity. In practical terms, average purchasing power in Sweden is significantly higher, though cost of living differences partially offset the raw income gap.
Population Density
Angola is 1.2x more densely populated than Sweden (29 vs 24 people per km²). Higher density typically correlates with more urbanization, greater demand for public transit, and higher housing costs. Sweden's lower density suggests more rural land use and potentially lower urban congestion.
Healthcare and Longevity
Citizens of Sweden live an average of 18.7 years longer than those of Angola (83.3 vs 64.6 years). This gap reflects differences in healthcare access, nutrition, public health infrastructure, and environmental factors. This is a substantial gap that suggests significant differences in healthcare systems and overall living conditions.
Economic Momentum
Angola's economy grew at 4.4% compared to Sweden's 0.8%. Both countries show healthy growth, though Angola has a modest edge in economic dynamism.
Travel Comparison
Angola vs Sweden for Families
For family travel, Sweden generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (2.0 vs 38.3 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Angola offers its own advantages, including more geographic diversity for road trips. Both countries have family-friendly attractions, though Sweden's higher GDP per capita typically correlates with better tourist infrastructure, public transport, and English-language availability.
Angola vs Sweden for Budget Travelers
Angola is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $2,665.874 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Angola can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Sweden. However, Sweden may offer better value in specific categories such as intercity transport or package deals. Shoulder season travel in either country helps reduce costs further.
Angola vs Sweden for Retirees
Sweden's life expectancy of 83.3 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Angola may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, climate preferences, and proximity to international airports. Both countries have established expat communities, though the specific visa options and healthcare quality vary by region within each country.
Angola vs Sweden Cost of Living
Sweden's GDP per capita is 21.4x that of Angola, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Sweden, while Angola offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significantly by city within each country. Major urban centers in Angola can approach or exceed average costs in Sweden's smaller cities.
Angola vs Sweden for Digital Nomads
For digital nomads choosing between Angola and Sweden, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Angola spans 1 timezone while Sweden covers 1. Angola's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote income. Both countries have growing digital nomad communities, though specific visa requirements for remote workers differ and should be verified before committing to a longer stay.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is bigger, Angola or Sweden by population?
Angola is larger by population, with 36.2M residents compared to Sweden's 10.6M. Angola is 3.4 times more populous than Sweden.
Which country has a higher GDP, Angola or Sweden?
Sweden has the higher GDP at $603.7B, compared to Angola's $101.0B. Sweden's economy is 6.0 times larger.
How does life expectancy compare between Angola and Sweden?
Sweden has a higher life expectancy at 83.3 years, compared to Angola's 64.6 years. The gap between the two countries is 18.7 years. Angola's life expectancy is 7.4 years below the global average of 72 years, while Sweden's is 11.3 years above the global average of 72 years.
Which country is larger by area, Angola or Sweden?
Angola is larger by land area, covering 1,246,700 km² compared to Sweden's 450,295 km². Angola is 2.8 times larger than Sweden.
What languages are spoken in Angola and Sweden?
Angola recognizes the following official language: Portuguese. Sweden recognizes: Swedish. The two countries do not share an official language.
Which country has lower inflation, Angola or Sweden?
Sweden has lower inflation at 2.8%, compared to Angola's 28.2%. Sweden's inflation is within the 2-3% range considered stable by most central banks, while Angola's rate is severely elevated at 28.2%, a rate that erodes household purchasing power.
Is Angola or Sweden better for a family holiday?
For family travel, Sweden generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (2.0 vs 38.3 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Angola offers its own advantages, including more geographic diversity for road trips. Both countries have family-friendly att...
Is Angola or Sweden cheaper to visit?
Angola is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $2,665.874 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Angola can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Sweden. However, Sweden may offer better value in ...
Is Angola or Sweden better for retirement?
Sweden's life expectancy of 83.3 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Angola may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, climate...
Is Angola or Sweden more expensive to live in?
Sweden's GDP per capita is 21.4x that of Angola, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Sweden, while Angola offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significantly by...
Is Angola or Sweden better for digital nomads?
For digital nomads choosing between Angola and Sweden, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Angola spans 1 timezone while Sweden covers 1. Angola's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote income. B...