Sudan vs Rwanda
Sudan has a population of 51.7M, compared to Rwanda's 14.1M. Sudan is 3.7 times more populous than Rwanda. Economically, Sudan ($49.7B) has a GDP 3.5 times larger than Rwanda's ($14.3B). Sudan covers 1,886,068 km², 71.6 times larger than Rwanda's 26,338 km². Life expectancy in Rwanda stands at 67.8 years, 1.5 years higher than Sudan's 66.3 years.
SudanRwanda| Population | +266.3%51.7M | -72.7%14.1M |
| Area | +7061.0%1,886,068 km² | -98.6%26,338 km² |
| GDP | +248.5%$49.7B | -71.3%$14.3B |
| GDP Per Capita | -1.5%$984.608 | +1.5%$999.655 |
| Life Expectancy | -2.1%66.3 yrs | +2.2%67.8 yrs |
| Infant Mortality | +28.5%39.2 | -22.2%30.5 |
| Literacy Rate | — | — |
| Unemployment | — | 11.4% |
| Capital | Khartoum | Kigali |
| Region | Africa | Africa |
| Languages | Arabic, English | English, French, Kinyarwanda |
| Currencies | SDG (ج.س) | RWF (Fr) |
Last updated: March 2026
All data sourced from World Bank Open Data (2025) and REST Countries API. Economic data may reflect most recent available year.
Population Comparison
Sudan is 3.7 times more populous than Rwanda, with 51.7M residents compared to 14.1M. Sudan is among the world's 30 most populous countries, while Rwanda is a nation of 14.1M people. In terms of population density, Sudan averages 27 people per km² (sparse), while Rwanda averages 536 people per km² (dense). Population growth rate data is not available for either country over the past decade.
Economy Comparison
Sudan is classified as a low-income economy, while Rwanda is classified as a low-income economy. The Sudan economy ($49.7B) is 3.5 times larger than Rwanda's ($14.3B). Sudan's GDP per capita of $984.608 is 55% below the regional average of 2,200 for Africa. Rwanda's GDP per capita of $999.655 is 55% below the regional average of 2,200 for Africa. On a per-capita basis, residents of Rwanda are on average 1.0 times wealthier than those in Sudan.
Health & Quality of Life
Life expectancy in Sudan is 66.3 years, compared to 67.8 years in Rwanda, a gap of 1.5 years. Rwanda (67.8 years) is 4.2 years below the global average of 72 years, while Sudan (66.3 years) is 5.7 years below the global average of 72 years. At 39.2 deaths per 1,000 live births, Sudan's infant mortality is 29% higher than Rwanda's 30.5.
Geographic Comparison
Sudan (1,886,068 km²) is 71.6 times larger by land area than Rwanda (26,338 km²). Sudan shares borders with 7 countries, while Rwanda borders 4 countries. Sudan spans 1 timezone, compared to Rwanda's 1 timezone. Both Sudan and Rwanda are located in Africa. Both countries fall within the Africa region, though they occupy different subregions: Northern Africa and Eastern Africa.
Key Differences
The most significant difference between Sudan and Rwanda is in land area: Sudan's 1,886,068 km² compared to Rwanda's 26,338 km² represents a 99% gap. The most significant difference between Sudan and Rwanda is in population: Sudan's 51.7M compared to Rwanda's 14.1M represents a 73% gap. The most significant difference between Sudan and Rwanda is in GDP: Sudan's $49.7B compared to Rwanda's $14.3B represents a 71% gap. These disparities reflect the broader structural differences between Sudan's low-income economy and Rwanda's low-income economy.
At a Glance: What the Numbers Mean
Living Standards
Rwanda has a GDP per capita of $999.655, which is 1.0x that of Sudan ($984.608). This gap reflects differences in economic development, industrial structure, and workforce productivity. In practical terms, average purchasing power in Rwanda is significantly higher, though cost of living differences partially offset the raw income gap.
Population Density
Rwanda is 19.6x more densely populated than Sudan (536 vs 27 people per km²). Higher density typically correlates with more urbanization, greater demand for public transit, and higher housing costs. Sudan's lower density suggests more rural land use and potentially lower urban congestion.
Healthcare and Longevity
Citizens of Rwanda live an average of 1.5 years longer than those of Sudan (67.8 vs 66.3 years). This gap reflects differences in healthcare access, nutrition, public health infrastructure, and environmental factors. This is a moderate difference that could narrow with continued development.
Economic Momentum
Rwanda's economy grew at 8.9% compared to Sudan's -14.0%. Rwanda's high growth rate suggests a rapidly developing economy with expanding opportunities. Sudan's negative growth indicates economic contraction.
Travel Comparison
Sudan vs Rwanda for Families
For family travel, Rwanda generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (30.5 vs 39.2 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Sudan offers its own advantages, including more geographic diversity for road trips. Both countries have family-friendly attractions, though Rwanda's higher GDP per capita typically correlates with better tourist infrastructure, public transport, and English-language availability.
Sudan vs Rwanda for Budget Travelers
Sudan is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $984.608 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Sudan can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Rwanda. However, Rwanda may offer better value in specific categories such as intercity transport or package deals. Shoulder season travel in either country helps reduce costs further.
Sudan vs Rwanda for Retirees
Rwanda's life expectancy of 67.8 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Sudan may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, climate preferences, and proximity to international airports. Both countries have established expat communities, though the specific visa options and healthcare quality vary by region within each country.
Sudan vs Rwanda Cost of Living
Rwanda's GDP per capita is 1.0x that of Sudan, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Rwanda, while Sudan offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significantly by city within each country. Major urban centers in Sudan can approach or exceed average costs in Rwanda's smaller cities.
Sudan vs Rwanda for Digital Nomads
For digital nomads choosing between Sudan and Rwanda, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Sudan spans 1 timezone while Rwanda covers 1. Sudan's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote income. Both countries have growing digital nomad communities, though specific visa requirements for remote workers differ and should be verified before committing to a longer stay.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is bigger, Sudan or Rwanda by population?
Sudan is larger by population, with 51.7M residents compared to Rwanda's 14.1M. Sudan is 3.7 times more populous than Rwanda.
Which country has a higher GDP, Sudan or Rwanda?
Sudan has the higher GDP at $49.7B, compared to Rwanda's $14.3B. Sudan's economy is 3.5 times larger.
How does life expectancy compare between Sudan and Rwanda?
Rwanda has a higher life expectancy at 67.8 years, compared to Sudan's 66.3 years. The gap between the two countries is 1.5 years. Sudan's life expectancy is 5.7 years below the global average of 72 years, while Rwanda's is 4.2 years below the global average of 72 years.
Which country is larger by area, Sudan or Rwanda?
Sudan is larger by land area, covering 1,886,068 km² compared to Rwanda's 26,338 km². Sudan is 71.6 times larger than Rwanda.
What languages are spoken in Sudan and Rwanda?
Sudan recognizes the following languages: Arabic, English. Rwanda recognizes: English, French, Kinyarwanda. Both countries share at least one common language.
Which country has lower inflation, Sudan or Rwanda?
Inflation data is not available for Sudan. Rwanda's inflation rate is 1.8%.
Is Sudan or Rwanda better for a family holiday?
For family travel, Rwanda generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (30.5 vs 39.2 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Sudan offers its own advantages, including more geographic diversity for road trips. Both countries have family-friendly att...
Is Sudan or Rwanda cheaper to visit?
Sudan is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $984.608 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Sudan can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Rwanda. However, Rwanda may offer better value in spec...
Is Sudan or Rwanda better for retirement?
Rwanda's life expectancy of 67.8 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Sudan may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, climate ...
Is Sudan or Rwanda more expensive to live in?
Rwanda's GDP per capita is 1.0x that of Sudan, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Rwanda, while Sudan offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significantly by ci...
Is Sudan or Rwanda better for digital nomads?
For digital nomads choosing between Sudan and Rwanda, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Sudan spans 1 timezone while Rwanda covers 1. Sudan's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote income. Both...