Zimbabwe has a population of 17.1M, compared to Brazil's 213.4M. Brazil is 12.5 times more populous than Zimbabwe. Economically, Brazil ($2.19T) has a GDP 52.6 times larger than Zimbabwe's ($41.5B). Brazil covers 8,515,767 km², 21.8 times larger than Zimbabwe's 390,757 km². Life expectancy in Brazil stands at 75.8 years, 13.1 years higher than Zimbabwe's 62.8 years.
| Population | 17.1M | 213.4M |
| Area | 390,757 km² | 8,515,767 km² |
| GDP | $41.5B | $2.19T |
| GDP Per Capita | $2,497.203 | $10,310.549 |
| Life Expectancy | 62.8 yrs | 75.8 yrs |
| Infant Mortality | 40.6 | 12.5 |
| Literacy Rate | — | — |
| Unemployment | 9.3% | 6.0% |
| Capital | Harare | Brasília |
| Region | Africa | Americas |
| Languages | Chibarwe, English, Kalanga, Khoisan, Ndau, Northern Ndebele, Chewa, Shona, Sotho, Tonga, Tswana, Tsonga, Venda, Xhosa, Zimbabwean Sign Language | Portuguese |
| Currencies | ZWL ($) | BRL (R$) |
Last updated: April 2026
All data sourced from World Bank Open Data (2025) and REST Countries API. Economic data may reflect most recent available year.
Brazil is 12.5 times more populous than Zimbabwe, with 213.4M residents compared to 17.1M. Zimbabwe is a nation of 17.1M people, while Brazil is among the world's 15 most populous countries. In terms of population density, Zimbabwe averages 44 people per km² (sparse), while Brazil averages 25 people per km² (sparse). While Zimbabwe has grown at 1.55% annually over the past decade, Brazil has grown at 0.62% per year over the same period.
Zimbabwe is classified as a lower-middle-income economy, while Brazil is classified as a upper-middle-income economy. The Brazil economy ($2.19T) is 52.6 times larger than Zimbabwe's ($41.5B). Zimbabwe's GDP per capita of $2,497.203 is 14% above the regional average of 2,200 for Africa. Brazil's GDP per capita of $10,310.549 is 24% below the regional average of 13,500 for Americas. On a per-capita basis, residents of Brazil are on average 4.1 times wealthier than those in Zimbabwe.
Life expectancy in Zimbabwe is 62.8 years, compared to 75.8 years in Brazil, a gap of 13.1 years. Brazil (75.8 years) is 3.8 years above the global average of 72 years, while Zimbabwe (62.8 years) is 9.2 years below the global average of 72 years. At 40.6 deaths per 1,000 live births, Zimbabwe's infant mortality is 225% higher than Brazil's 12.5.
Brazil (8,515,767 km²) is 21.8 times larger by land area than Zimbabwe (390,757 km²). Zimbabwe shares borders with 4 countries, while Brazil borders 10 countries. Zimbabwe spans 1 timezone, compared to Brazil's 4 timezones. Zimbabwe lies in Africa, while Brazil is located in South America. Zimbabwe is categorized within the Africa region (Southern Africa), whereas Brazil belongs to Americas (South America).
The most significant difference between Zimbabwe and Brazil is in GDP: Zimbabwe's $41.5B compared to Brazil's $2.19T represents a 98% gap. The most significant difference between Zimbabwe and Brazil is in land area: Zimbabwe's 390,757 km² compared to Brazil's 8,515,767 km² represents a 95% gap. The most significant difference between Zimbabwe and Brazil is in population: Zimbabwe's 17.1M compared to Brazil's 213.4M represents a 92% gap. These disparities reflect the broader structural differences between Zimbabwe's lower-middle-income economy and Brazil's upper-middle-income economy.
Brazil has a GDP per capita of $10,310.549, which is 4.1x that of Zimbabwe ($2,497.203). This gap reflects differences in economic development, industrial structure, and workforce productivity. In practical terms, average purchasing power in Brazil is significantly higher, though cost of living differences partially offset the raw income gap.
Zimbabwe is 1.7x more densely populated than Brazil (44 vs 25 people per km²). Higher density typically correlates with more urbanization, greater demand for public transit, and higher housing costs. Brazil's lower density suggests more rural land use and potentially lower urban congestion.
Citizens of Brazil live an average of 13.1 years longer than those of Zimbabwe (75.8 vs 62.8 years). This gap reflects differences in healthcare access, nutrition, public health infrastructure, and environmental factors. This is a substantial gap that suggests significant differences in healthcare systems and overall living conditions.
Brazil's economy grew at 3.4% compared to Zimbabwe's 1.7%. Both countries show healthy growth, though Brazil has a modest edge in economic dynamism.
For family travel, Brazil generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (12.5 vs 40.6 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Zimbabwe offers its own advantages, including a more compact geography that is easier to navigate with children. Both countries have family-friendly attractions, though Brazil's higher GDP per capita typically correlates with better tourist infrastructure, public transport, and English-language availability.
Zimbabwe is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $2,497.203 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Zimbabwe can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Brazil. However, Brazil may offer better value in specific categories such as intercity transport or package deals. Shoulder season travel in either country helps reduce costs further.
Brazil's life expectancy of 75.8 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Zimbabwe may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, climate preferences, and proximity to international airports. Both countries have established expat communities, though the specific visa options and healthcare quality vary by region within each country.
Brazil's GDP per capita is 4.1x that of Zimbabwe, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Brazil, while Zimbabwe offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significantly by city within each country. Major urban centers in Zimbabwe can approach or exceed average costs in Brazil's smaller cities.
For digital nomads choosing between Zimbabwe and Brazil, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Zimbabwe spans 1 timezone while Brazil covers 4. Zimbabwe's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote income. Both countries have growing digital nomad communities, though specific visa requirements for remote workers differ and should be verified before committing to a longer stay.
Brazil is larger by population, with 213.4M residents compared to Zimbabwe's 17.1M. Brazil is 12.5 times more populous than Zimbabwe.
Brazil has the higher GDP at $2.19T, compared to Zimbabwe's $41.5B. Brazil's economy is 52.6 times larger.
Brazil has a higher life expectancy at 75.8 years, compared to Zimbabwe's 62.8 years. The gap between the two countries is 13.1 years. Zimbabwe's life expectancy is 9.2 years below the global average of 72 years, while Brazil's is 3.8 years above the global average of 72 years.
Brazil is larger by land area, covering 8,515,767 km² compared to Zimbabwe's 390,757 km². Brazil is 21.8 times larger than Zimbabwe.
Zimbabwe recognizes the following languages: Chibarwe, English, Kalanga, Khoisan, Ndau, Northern Ndebele, Chewa, Shona, Sotho, Tonga, Tswana, Tsonga, Venda, Xhosa, Zimbabwean Sign Language. Brazil recognizes: Portuguese. The two countries do not share an official language.
Inflation data is not available for Zimbabwe. Brazil's inflation rate is 4.4%.
For family travel, Brazil generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (12.5 vs 40.6 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Zimbabwe offers its own advantages, including a more compact geography that is easier to navigate with children. Both countr...
Zimbabwe is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $2,497.203 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Zimbabwe can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Brazil. However, Brazil may offer better value...
Brazil's life expectancy of 75.8 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Zimbabwe may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, clima...
Brazil's GDP per capita is 4.1x that of Zimbabwe, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Brazil, while Zimbabwe offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significantly...
For digital nomads choosing between Zimbabwe and Brazil, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Zimbabwe spans 1 timezone while Brazil covers 4. Zimbabwe's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote inc...
Zimbabwe, 1994 to 2023
Brazil, 1994 to 2023