Zimbabwe has a population of 17.1M, compared to Papua New Guinea's 11.8M. Zimbabwe is 1.4 times more populous than Papua New Guinea. Economically, Zimbabwe ($41.5B) has a GDP 1.3 times larger than Papua New Guinea's ($31.8B). Papua New Guinea covers 462,840 km², 1.2 times larger than Zimbabwe's 390,757 km². Life expectancy in Papua New Guinea stands at 66.1 years, 3.4 years higher than Zimbabwe's 62.8 years.
| Population | 17.1M | 11.8M |
| Area | 390,757 km² | 462,840 km² |
| GDP | $41.5B | $31.8B |
| GDP Per Capita | $2,497.203 | $3,006.706 |
| Life Expectancy | 62.8 yrs | 66.1 yrs |
| Infant Mortality | 40.6 | 32.0 |
| Literacy Rate | — | — |
| Unemployment | 9.3% | 2.6% |
| Capital | Harare | Port Moresby |
| Region | Africa | Oceania |
| Languages | Chibarwe, English, Kalanga, Khoisan, Ndau, Northern Ndebele, Chewa, Shona, Sotho, Tonga, Tswana, Tsonga, Venda, Xhosa, Zimbabwean Sign Language | English, Hiri Motu, Tok Pisin |
| Currencies | ZWL ($) | PGK (K) |
Last updated: March 2026
All data sourced from World Bank Open Data (2025) and REST Countries API. Economic data may reflect most recent available year.
Zimbabwe is 1.4 times more populous than Papua New Guinea, with 17.1M residents compared to 11.8M. Zimbabwe is a nation of 17.1M people, while Papua New Guinea is a nation of 11.8M people. In terms of population density, Zimbabwe averages 44 people per km² (sparse), while Papua New Guinea averages 25 people per km² (sparse). While Zimbabwe has grown at 1.55% annually over the past decade, Papua New Guinea has grown at 2.27% per year over the same period.
Zimbabwe is classified as a lower-middle-income economy, while Papua New Guinea is classified as a lower-middle-income economy. The Zimbabwe economy ($41.5B) is 1.3 times larger than Papua New Guinea's ($31.8B). Zimbabwe's GDP per capita of $2,497.203 is 14% above the regional average of 2,200 for Africa. Papua New Guinea's GDP per capita of $3,006.706 is 90% below the regional average of 31,500 for Oceania. On a per-capita basis, residents of Papua New Guinea are on average 1.2 times wealthier than those in Zimbabwe.
Life expectancy in Zimbabwe is 62.8 years, compared to 66.1 years in Papua New Guinea, a gap of 3.4 years. Papua New Guinea (66.1 years) is 5.9 years below the global average of 72 years, while Zimbabwe (62.8 years) is 9.2 years below the global average of 72 years. At 40.6 deaths per 1,000 live births, Zimbabwe's infant mortality is 27% higher than Papua New Guinea's 32.0.
Papua New Guinea (462,840 km²) is 1.2 times larger by land area than Zimbabwe (390,757 km²). Zimbabwe shares borders with 4 countries, while Papua New Guinea borders 1 country. Zimbabwe spans 1 timezone, compared to Papua New Guinea's 1 timezone. Zimbabwe lies in Africa, while Papua New Guinea is located in Oceania. Zimbabwe is categorized within the Africa region (Southern Africa), whereas Papua New Guinea belongs to Oceania (Melanesia).
The most significant difference between Zimbabwe and Papua New Guinea is in population: Zimbabwe's 17.1M compared to Papua New Guinea's 11.8M represents a 31% gap. The most significant difference between Zimbabwe and Papua New Guinea is in GDP: Zimbabwe's $41.5B compared to Papua New Guinea's $31.8B represents a 23% gap. The most significant difference between Zimbabwe and Papua New Guinea is in infant mortality: Zimbabwe's 40.6 per 1,000 compared to Papua New Guinea's 32.0 per 1,000 represents a 21% gap. These disparities reflect the broader structural differences between Zimbabwe's lower-middle-income economy and Papua New Guinea's lower-middle-income economy.
Papua New Guinea has a GDP per capita of $3,006.706, which is 1.2x that of Zimbabwe ($2,497.203). This gap reflects differences in economic development, industrial structure, and workforce productivity. In practical terms, average purchasing power in Papua New Guinea is significantly higher, though cost of living differences partially offset the raw income gap.
Zimbabwe is 1.7x more densely populated than Papua New Guinea (44 vs 25 people per km²). Higher density typically correlates with more urbanization, greater demand for public transit, and higher housing costs. Papua New Guinea's lower density suggests more rural land use and potentially lower urban congestion.
Citizens of Papua New Guinea live an average of 3.4 years longer than those of Zimbabwe (66.1 vs 62.8 years). This gap reflects differences in healthcare access, nutrition, public health infrastructure, and environmental factors. This is a moderate difference that could narrow with continued development.
Papua New Guinea's economy grew at 3.8% compared to Zimbabwe's 1.7%. Both countries show healthy growth, though Papua New Guinea has a modest edge in economic dynamism.
For family travel, Papua New Guinea generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (32.0 vs 40.6 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Zimbabwe offers its own advantages, including a more compact geography that is easier to navigate with children. Both countries have family-friendly attractions, though Papua New Guinea's higher GDP per capita typically correlates with better tourist infrastructure, public transport, and English-language availability.
Zimbabwe is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $2,497.203 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Zimbabwe can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Papua New Guinea. However, Papua New Guinea may offer better value in specific categories such as intercity transport or package deals. Shoulder season travel in either country helps reduce costs further.
Papua New Guinea's life expectancy of 66.1 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Zimbabwe may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, climate preferences, and proximity to international airports. Both countries have established expat communities, though the specific visa options and healthcare quality vary by region within each country.
Papua New Guinea's GDP per capita is 1.2x that of Zimbabwe, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Papua New Guinea, while Zimbabwe offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living varies significantly by city within each country. Major urban centers in Zimbabwe can approach or exceed average costs in Papua New Guinea's smaller cities.
For digital nomads choosing between Zimbabwe and Papua New Guinea, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Zimbabwe spans 1 timezone while Papua New Guinea covers 1. Zimbabwe's lower cost of living makes it attractive for stretching remote income. Both countries have growing digital nomad communities, though specific visa requirements for remote workers differ and should be verified before committing to a longer stay.
Zimbabwe is larger by population, with 17.1M residents compared to Papua New Guinea's 11.8M. Zimbabwe is 1.4 times more populous than Papua New Guinea.
Zimbabwe has the higher GDP at $41.5B, compared to Papua New Guinea's $31.8B. Zimbabwe's economy is 1.3 times larger.
Papua New Guinea has a higher life expectancy at 66.1 years, compared to Zimbabwe's 62.8 years. The gap between the two countries is 3.4 years. Zimbabwe's life expectancy is 9.2 years below the global average of 72 years, while Papua New Guinea's is 5.9 years below the global average of 72 years.
Papua New Guinea is larger by land area, covering 462,840 km² compared to Zimbabwe's 390,757 km². Papua New Guinea is 1.2 times larger than Zimbabwe.
Zimbabwe recognizes the following languages: Chibarwe, English, Kalanga, Khoisan, Ndau, Northern Ndebele, Chewa, Shona, Sotho, Tonga, Tswana, Tsonga, Venda, Xhosa, Zimbabwean Sign Language. Papua New Guinea recognizes: English, Hiri Motu, Tok Pisin. Both countries share at least one common language.
Inflation data is not available for Zimbabwe. Papua New Guinea's inflation rate is 0.6%.
For family travel, Papua New Guinea generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (32.0 vs 40.6 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. Zimbabwe offers its own advantages, including a more compact geography that is easier to navigate with children. B...
Zimbabwe is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $2,497.203 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Zimbabwe can expect to spend significantly less per day than in Papua New Guinea. However, Papua New Guinea ma...
Papua New Guinea's life expectancy of 66.1 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. Zimbabwe may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare acc...
Papua New Guinea's GDP per capita is 1.2x that of Zimbabwe, which generally correlates with a higher cost of living. Housing, dining out, and services tend to be more expensive in Papua New Guinea, while Zimbabwe offers more purchasing power per dollar for everyday expenses. However, cost of living ...
For digital nomads choosing between Zimbabwe and Papua New Guinea, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Zimbabwe spans 1 timezone while Papua New Guinea covers 1. Zimbabwe's lower cost of living makes it attractive for s...
Zimbabwe, 1994 to 2023
Papua New Guinea, 1994 to 2023