MexicoSouth Sudan
Mexico has a population of 130.6M, compared to South Sudan's 15.8M. Mexico is 8.3 times more populous than South Sudan. Mexico covers 1,964,375 km², 3.2 times larger than South Sudan's 619,745 km². Life expectancy in Mexico stands at 75.1 years, 17.5 years higher than South Sudan's 57.6 years.
4
Mexico wins
vs
0
South Sudan wins
Metric
MexicoSouth Sudan| Population | 130.6M | 15.8M |
| Area | 1,964,375 km² | 619,745 km² |
| GDP | $1.86T | — |
| GDP Per Capita | $14,185.781 | — |
| Life Expectancy | 75.1 yrs | 57.6 yrs |
| Infant Mortality | 10.8 | 72.6 |
| Literacy Rate | 95.9% | — |
| Unemployment | 2.7% | — |
| Capital | Mexico City | Juba |
| Region | Americas | Africa |
| Languages | Spanish | English |
| Currencies | MXN ($) | SSP (£) |
Last updated: March 2026
All data sourced from World Bank Open Data (2025) and REST Countries API. Economic data may reflect most recent available year.
Population Comparison
Mexico is 8.3 times more populous than South Sudan, with 130.6M residents compared to 15.8M. Mexico is among the world's 15 most populous countries, while South Sudan is a nation of 15.8M people. In terms of population density, Mexico averages 66 people per km² (moderate), while South Sudan averages 25 people per km² (sparse). Mexico has grown at 0.92% annually over the past decade. Population growth data is not available for South Sudan.
Economy Comparison
Mexico is classified as a high-income economy, while South Sudan is classified as a low-income economy. Mexico's GDP stands at $1.86T. GDP data is not available for South Sudan. Mexico's GDP per capita of $14,185.781 is 5% above the regional average of 13,500 for Americas. Economic indicator data is not available for South Sudan.
Health & Quality of Life
Life expectancy in Mexico is 75.1 years, compared to 57.6 years in South Sudan, a gap of 17.5 years. Mexico (75.1 years) is 3.1 years above the global average of 72 years, while South Sudan (57.6 years) is 14.4 years below the global average of 72 years. At 72.6 deaths per 1,000 live births, South Sudan's infant mortality is 572% higher than Mexico's 10.8.
Geographic Comparison
Mexico (1,964,375 km²) is 3.2 times larger by land area than South Sudan (619,745 km²). Mexico shares borders with 3 countries, while South Sudan borders 6 countries. Mexico spans 3 timezones, compared to South Sudan's 1 timezone. Mexico lies in North America, while South Sudan is located in Africa. Mexico is categorized within the Americas region (North America), whereas South Sudan belongs to Africa (Middle Africa).
Key Differences
The most significant difference between Mexico and South Sudan is in population: Mexico's 130.6M compared to South Sudan's 15.8M represents a 88% gap. The most significant difference between Mexico and South Sudan is in infant mortality: Mexico's 10.8 per 1,000 compared to South Sudan's 72.6 per 1,000 represents a 85% gap. The most significant difference between Mexico and South Sudan is in land area: Mexico's 1,964,375 km² compared to South Sudan's 619,745 km² represents a 68% gap. These disparities reflect the broader structural differences between Mexico's high-income economy and South Sudan's low-income economy.
At a Glance: What the Numbers Mean
Population Density
Mexico is 2.6x more densely populated than South Sudan (66 vs 25 people per km²). Higher density typically correlates with more urbanization, greater demand for public transit, and higher housing costs. South Sudan's lower density suggests more rural land use and potentially lower urban congestion.
Healthcare and Longevity
Citizens of Mexico live an average of 17.5 years longer than those of South Sudan (75.1 vs 57.6 years). This gap reflects differences in healthcare access, nutrition, public health infrastructure, and environmental factors. This is a substantial gap that suggests significant differences in healthcare systems and overall living conditions.
Travel Comparison
Mexico vs South Sudan for Families
For family travel, Mexico generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (10.8 vs 72.6 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. South Sudan offers its own advantages, including a more compact geography that is easier to navigate with children. Both countries have family-friendly attractions, though Mexico's higher GDP per capita typically correlates with better tourist infrastructure, public transport, and English-language availability.
Mexico vs South Sudan for Budget Travelers
Mexico is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $14,185.781 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Mexico can expect to spend significantly less per day than in South Sudan. However, South Sudan may offer better value in specific categories such as intercity transport or package deals. Shoulder season travel in either country helps reduce costs further.
Mexico vs South Sudan for Retirees
Mexico's life expectancy of 75.1 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. South Sudan may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, climate preferences, and proximity to international airports. Both countries have established expat communities, though the specific visa options and healthcare quality vary by region within each country.
Mexico vs South Sudan for Digital Nomads
For digital nomads choosing between Mexico and South Sudan, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Mexico spans 3 timezones while South Sudan covers 1. Cost of living varies by city in both countries. Both countries have growing digital nomad communities, though specific visa requirements for remote workers differ and should be verified before committing to a longer stay.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is bigger, Mexico or South Sudan by population?
Mexico is larger by population, with 130.6M residents compared to South Sudan's 15.8M. Mexico is 8.3 times more populous than South Sudan.
Which country has a higher GDP, Mexico or South Sudan?
GDP data is not available for South Sudan. Please refer to the World Bank for the most current figures.
How does life expectancy compare between Mexico and South Sudan?
Mexico has a higher life expectancy at 75.1 years, compared to South Sudan's 57.6 years. The gap between the two countries is 17.5 years. Mexico's life expectancy is 3.1 years above the global average of 72 years, while South Sudan's is 14.4 years below the global average of 72 years.
Which country is larger by area, Mexico or South Sudan?
Mexico is larger by land area, covering 1,964,375 km² compared to South Sudan's 619,745 km². Mexico is 3.2 times larger than South Sudan.
What languages are spoken in Mexico and South Sudan?
Mexico recognizes the following official language: Spanish. South Sudan recognizes: English. The two countries do not share an official language.
Which country has lower inflation, Mexico or South Sudan?
Mexico has lower inflation at 4.7%, compared to South Sudan's 91.4%. Mexico's inflation is moderately elevated above the global median of 3.5%, while South Sudan's rate is severely elevated at 91.4%, a rate that erodes household purchasing power.
Is Mexico or South Sudan better for a family holiday?
For family travel, Mexico generally edges ahead due to lower infant mortality (10.8 vs 72.6 per 1,000), which is a useful proxy for healthcare infrastructure and child safety. South Sudan offers its own advantages, including a more compact geography that is easier to navigate with children. Both cou...
Is Mexico or South Sudan cheaper to visit?
Mexico is typically the more budget-friendly destination, with a GDP per capita of $14,185.781 translating to lower prices for accommodation, food, and local transport. Budget travelers in Mexico can expect to spend significantly less per day than in South Sudan. However, South Sudan may offer bette...
Is Mexico or South Sudan better for retirement?
Mexico's life expectancy of 75.1 years suggests stronger healthcare infrastructure, which is a key factor for retirees. South Sudan may offer a lower cost of living, which stretches pension income further. Key considerations for retirees include visa and residency requirements, healthcare access, cl...
Is Mexico or South Sudan better for digital nomads?
For digital nomads choosing between Mexico and South Sudan, key factors include internet infrastructure, visa policies, cost of living, and timezone compatibility with clients. Mexico spans 3 timezones while South Sudan covers 1. Cost of living varies by city in both countries. Both countries have g...